Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop
Buy Sarms online

Buy SARMs online

Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) have become a buzzword in recent years among a wide range of people: from bodybuilders to professional athletes, but are SARMs really a safer and healthier alternative to steroids? anabolics?

SARM cycles appear to be an attractive option with legitimate benefits over anabolic steroid cycles with the way SARMs have been developed to target only specific androgen receptors so we get effects that are much more selective without the effects. Associated negatives of having non-specific receptors involved that can cause problems like prostate enlargement.

But the research on SARMs hasn’t gotten there yet, and many have come and gone in the R&D process at pharmaceutical companies. This makes SARMs a gray area, but it hasn’t diminished their popularity, which is growing year after year.


SARMs have become increasingly popular as a potentially safer and less risky alternative to anabolic steroids among high-performance athletes and bodybuilders.

There are two types of SARMs: steroidal and non-steroidal. Steroidal SARMs have been around for over 70 years, non-steroidal SARMs are relatively new. Nonsteroidal SARMs can bind to androgen receptors in muscle and bone, where they can have anabolic effects.

Below are some of the more common SARMs you will come across and their half-lives:

SARM Active half-life

⦁ Testolone RAD-140 20 to 24 hours
⦁ Cardarine GW-501516 16 to 24 hours
⦁ Ligandrol LGD-4033 24 to 36 hours
⦁ Ostarine MK-2866 24 hours
⦁ Andarine S4 3 to 4 hours
⦁ SARM S-23 12 hours
⦁ YK-11 Myostatin 6 to 8 hours
⦁ Nutrobal MK-677 24 hours
⦁ Stenabolic SR-9009 4 hours

Remember: with SARMs we are dealing with experimental and investigational compounds whose benefits and adverse effects are still being determined both in the laboratory and off the record by those who use them for performance enhancement.


All SARMs are selective androgen receptor modulators. Other compounds that do not fall into this category but are sometimes lumped in with SARMs (such as Cardarine) are also covered in this guide because they are often considered for use in performance enhancement in the same way that SARMs are simply for one main reason: SARMs and similar compounds provide a real alternative to anabolic steroids.

The main SARMs that bodybuilders and athletes constantly talk about are:

⦁ Testolone RAD-140
⦁ Cardarine GW-501516
⦁ Ligandrol LGD-4033
⦁ Ostarine MK-2866
⦁ Andarine S4
⦁ GTX S-23
⦁ Myostatin YK-11 inhibitor
⦁ Nutrobal MK-677
⦁ Stenabolic SR-9009

Now let’s look at them in more detail so you can make the best-informed decisions about which direction you want to go.

Testolone (RAD-140)

Testolone is currently considered to be the most powerful SARM of all available, even at low doses. Its benefits are found in the main areas of importance to bodybuilders: strength and muscle gains.

Testolone is still in development by the company Radius Health as a treatment for breast cancer, muscle atrophy, and as a safer alternative to testosterone replacement therapy.

Studies have shown that RAD-140 increases lean muscle mass exceptionally well by targeting androgen receptors in skeletal tissue. RAD-140 is believed to be the most androgenic SARM, but despite this, its androgenic activity is only about 10% that of testosterone.

Cardarine (GW-501516)

Cardarine belongs to a class of medications designed to treat cardiovascular conditions, obesity, type 2 diabetes, among other syndromes. It has been shown to be able to dramatically reduce cholesterol levels. It is also valued by high-performance athletes for some specific reasons, as we will see.

Cardarine is not technically a SARM, rather it is a Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor (PPAR) agonist. PPARs differ from SARMs in several ways: they do not bind to the androgen receptor and they are not anabolic.

There is no effect on testosterone from PPARs like Cardarine. Its main medical use is for the treatment of metabolic syndromes mainly targeting blood sugar and triglycerides.

So without the beneficial anabolic properties compared to a SARM, what appeal does Cardarine have for bodybuilders and athletes? This is a compound for people looking for something a little different than a steroid alternative for muscle building. Exceptionally enhanced physical performance is where Cardarine shines.

Ligandrol (LGD-4033)

Ligandrol remains one of the most popular SARMs for people looking to bulk up with quality muscle gains.

Ligandrol has a history of human clinical trials showing that it was successful in increasing muscle mass and doing so without gaining fat. This makes it one of the few SARMs that has a very clear human history of doing what we expect it to do and making those effects work positively in the human body.

The main medical research surrounding Ligandrol focuses on its potential use for age-related muscle wasting, osteoporosis, and cancer, so we can expect this SARM to have excellent muscle-building and anabolic effects.

Ostarine (MK-2866)

You may see Ostarine go by several names: Enobosarm, Ostabolic, or just MK2866, which is simply the name of the research chemical. Like most SARMs, Ostarine is currently in development for its potential in treating conditions such as osteoporosis and muscle atrophy, among other conditions.

The goals of Ostarine that are of interest to athletes and those interested in physique enhancement are strength and muscle gains, as well as the promotion of an anti-catabolic state in the body, where no muscle is lost. Ostarine potentially has one of the best, if not the greatest, anabolic properties of any SARM currently available.

Like all SARMs, Ostarine binds to androgen receptors and only to selective receptor sites in muscle and bone tissue. It is a SARM that is useful for both fat loss and mass gain and while the gains are unlikely to exceed what you can get from more powerful anabolic steroids, Ostarine provides an alternative that reduces the number and severity of side effects in comparison with steroids.

Andarine (S4)

Andarine is a SARM that has found wide acceptance by athletes in a variety of disciplines.

I could say that this is a SARM that is loved and hated for several reasons, including the fact that it is not as powerful in its anabolic and androgenic effects compared to many other SARMs, but the fact that it is no longer under investigation and many the trials were not published, which makes this SARM more mysterious than others.

S4 is only a partial androgen receptor agonist rather than a full agonist like many other SARMs are. His research work has focused on the prostate, and the first results in animals show a reduction in prostate weight without loss of muscle mass. Laboratory studies also focus on its potential use for osteoporosis and muscle wasting treatments.


YK-11 is one of the strongest SARMs we have available right now, and some people describe it as the closest thing to a steroid without it being an anabolic steroid. This is because, like most other SARMs we looked at, YK-11 is in fact a steroidal SARM and has been formed as a modification of DHT, and this makes YK-11 much closer to steroids with those we are familiar with than many other common ones.


As with all regular SARMs, YK-11 is also banned as a performance-enhancing drug by doping agencies and sports bodies around the world. This tells us that YK-11 does indeed have very beneficial effects that can give athletes an edge. YK-11 binds only to androgen receptors in muscle and bone and may potentially be good for prostate health.

Nutrobal (Ibutamoren / MK-677)

Nutrobal is not a SARM, rather it is a non-peptide ghrelin receptor agonist. Like a SARM, it is still a selective agonist, so it only targets specific areas of the body.

It is able to replicate growth hormone stimulation, resulting in an increase in human growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), making this compound very useful for people looking to gain mass.
Nutrobal stimulates the production of human growth hormone and IGF-1, so essentially this is a SARM made for growth and very well suited for bodybuilders. It has been successfully shown to result in lean mass gains without raising the level of fat mass, meaning all gains are quality muscle. Human studies have not only found that MK-677 can increase muscle mass, but also improve bone mineral density.

Stenabol (SR-9009)

This investigational drug that has shown positive effects in mice in laboratory tests, including increased endurance and decreased cholesterol, anxiety, inflammation, and weight. These properties, if they can be translated to humans, are attractive to athletes, and in particular those focused on endurance activity.
The main objective of the development of this drug was to study the circadian rhythm, which is how our body works throughout a 24-hour cycle of day and night.

For athletes, the benefits of Stenabolic translate into increased endurance, strength, and more efficient use of glucose and fat, ultimately increasing performance so you can train longer and, if desired, burn fat if your diet supports that goal.


SARMs can target androgen receptors in different parts of the body selectively. This makes SARMs very valuable from a medical standpoint, where treatment can potentially be personalized or customized to treat very specific conditions. This selective working of SARMs can also help eliminate side effects in other parts of the body that are not targeted by SARMs.

Because SARMs are designed to have similar effects to androgenic drugs without the same side effects, they are powerful in the way that they can be much more specific to target tissues compared to, say, hormone replacement therapy based on in testosterone.

This is the ultimate goal of SARMs – but at the moment they are still under development and not yet 100% selective with zero impact on non-target tissue, meaning we cannot yet get full anabolic effects on muscle and bone without some androgenic side effect and this is mainly focused on prostate related side effects in men.

Despite this, the truly powerful nature of some SARMs gives them a very impressive anabolic to androgenic ratio which can leave testosterone in the dust: for example, RAD-140 can have a ratio of up to 90:1, making it extremely anabolic. By comparison, the anabolic to androgenic ratio of testosterone is a standard 1:1.

Bodybuilders who use SARMs at higher than medical doses can certainly expect virilization side effects and it is these side effects that are often unknown to people who are new to SARMs who assume they don’t come with any of the side effects of anabolic steroids.


SARMs are not approved for human use in the US and other countries. Although they began to be developed in the 1990s to address medical issues such as post-cancer muscle recovery, full clinical trials of SARMs in humans have not yet been conducted and their development has been halted by pharmaceutical companies.

SARM sellers will usually try to get away with labeling supplements “research purposes only” while others might not even list ingredients at all. The unique research label does not stand up to legal scrutiny in most countries and will still hold the seller liable for breaking the law if they are caught selling products containing SARMs and this can carry very severe penalties.

Athletes who undergo drug tests and test positive for any SARMs are sanctioned and disqualified, indicating that these compounds are treated the same way in the sports world as anabolic steroids.
Although SARMs are legally in a gray area, it only takes a few seconds to locate dozens of websites claiming to sell SARMs, with many claiming to offer the “highest purity”, but it is almost impossible to prove the quality or even the legitimacy of these unregulated and unapproved products.

So are SARMs safer than steroids?

After all, this is one of the main reasons athletes choose to use SARMs instead of (but sometimes in conjunction with) anabolic steroids. SARMs are generally considered safer than steroids. Heavy, long-term steroid use can lead to very serious health problems, but that can also be the case with overuse of any substance.

The key to maintaining a higher level of safety with the use of SARMs is to not go crazy with the dosage and cycle with a proper recovery period without the use of any compound.

While steroids are extremely popular, especially among hardcore bodybuilders, they are not for everyone and some people are looking for a gentler and potentially less dangerous way of using performance-enhancing substances to gain an advantage.

While SARMs have a reputation for being safer than steroids, this isn’t necessarily true, so it’s critical to know exactly what you’re seeing with individual SARMs, rather than considering them all the same.
Just as every anabolic steroid is different, so is the case with different SARMs, but at their core, they all bind to androgen receptors selectively, so only specific areas of the body benefit from the SARMs effect.

The two main categories of SARMs are steroidal and non-steroidal SARMs. When it comes to non-steroidal SARMs that are primarily chosen for performance enhancement, some are great for muscle growth, while others are more helpful in aiding muscle repair and recovery.

Most SARMs will give you many of the same benefits as steroids:

⦁ Muscle gain
⦁ Decreased fat
⦁ Improved bone density and strength
⦁ Enhanced strength and endurance
⦁ Preserve muscle mass while reducing fat

The other benefits are in the area of side effects, or in the case of SARMs, the lack of the main negative side effects we experience with steroids that can literally destroy your gains: water retention and gynecomastia as a result of aromatization that causes estrogen levels to rise.

The lack of these consequences is a clear benefit of SARMs, although they are not totally free of side effects, regardless of what you may have heard on the grapevine.

One of the main reasons more athletes are interested in SARMs is because they lack the side effects that come with using anabolic steroids. However, this can be misleading for people who have little knowledge about SARMs, because they too can come with their own set of health risks and adverse effects.

Even though they are not anabolic steroids, SARMs are still a controlled substance by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) due to their clear performance-enhancing effects that give athletes an unnatural advantage.

Studies in mice have found that some SARMs can increase both bone and muscle mass and initial tests in humans have found that mass can be increased when SARMs are used without gaining fat. Other trials have shown more worrying results, and the development of cancer has led to research being halted in some cases.

What this shows is that the true effects of SARMs, both short-term and long-term, are still far from fully understood, but that doesn’t stop thousands of people from taking them and being satisfied with the results.

Unlike anabolic steroids that are directly injected or taken orally, most SARMs are included as ingredients in supplements, usually along with other ingredients. This can make them difficult to detect even for unsuspecting buyers who may not realize they are buying and consuming SARMs at all.

In the medical world, SARMs are being closely studied to determine how effective they might be in treating a variety of conditions, including aging-related conditions, osteoporosis, and cancer-related wasting syndromes.

A large area of interest is the potential use of SARMs to help build skeletal muscle mass in aging men and women, to reduce the incidence of fractures, pain, and the general loss of quality of life that most people experience people can expect to experience in old age.

We can clearly see from this medical use of SARMs how they would be appealing to young and fit athletes and bodybuilders who do not have such age-related skeletal or muscular degeneration or degeneration, but instead want to harness existing strength and muscle to improve performance.


If you’re seriously considering trying one or more SARMs, once you start researching where to get your SARMs, you’ll likely find your chosen compound in two forms: liquid and capsules.

Chemically, both are exactly the same, with the liquid form obviously being the original raw form of SARM, and the capsule being a manufactured product in a form that is familiar to everyone; After all, we all know how to take a capsule without thinking twice, but what do you do with a SARM in liquid form?

There are two things to consider here: one is how and where you plan to buy the SARM and the legalities involved, and the other is simply your preference on how to use it.

In the US, buying SARMs in liquid form is technically legal for research purposes, and this is the loophole many people use to get their hands on some SARMs. Because liquid SARMs have not been processed at all after being developed in the lab, they are clearly not intended for human use in a more commercialized form as we see with capsules.

This is why capsule forms of SARMs are illegal: they have obviously been processed and manufactured into a product for people to use, but contain a substance (the SARM) that is not legally approved for human use.

When it comes to which is better between liquid or capsule SARMs, there is no difference. As long as no other compound has been added to the capsules, these two forms are identical in terms of their effects on the body. But this leads to another point that must be seriously considered: because it is not legal to manufacture SARMs for human use in capsule form, this is not done in approved laboratories.

In fact, you are unlikely to know exactly where and how you’re SARM capsules have been manufactured, and this exposes you to the risk of not only a potentially low-quality product, but one that could be dangerous if the manufacturer has intentionally contaminated or unintentionally the capsules in some way or they did not produce them with a high quality.

If you want to eliminate the risk of low-quality or potentially dangerous SARM capsules manufactured underground, liquid SARMs purchased from research labs are likely your preferred choice.

Aside from the liquid and capsule formats of SARMs, which are the chemical in its original form without the addition of any other ingredients, some SARMs are of course included in some fitness supplements and that’s another avenue that people may consider when contemplating which SARMs to take and how to consume them.


With so many options now available in the world of performance-enhancing substances, covering virtually every aspect of fitness and physical goals, where do you start?

The three main categories we look at are anabolic steroids, SARMs, and prohormones.

Everyone seems to have an opinion on which is the best, but is one of these types of medication really better than the other? Or does it totally depend on your goals?

It’s best to be informed about the basics of each category of performance-enhancing drugs so that we can compare the most important pros and cons of each before making a decision on which to use. This is also wise when you have already used one type of medication and are considering trying another, but are still unsure if it will give you better or possibly worse results and side effects.

When it comes to comparing anabolic steroids to SARMs, there are a few basic points of difference.

First of all, SARMs are very specific in how they target muscle and bone tissue and therefore have reduced prostate effects in men and women, less virilization side effects compared to anabolic steroids, than in they are mostly derivatives of the male sex hormone testosterone.

The main benefit of SARMs compared to steroids is that SARMs do not convert to DHT or estrogen although they also bind to the androgen receptor. This means we don’t get the serious androgenic side effects seen with anabolic steroids, such as breast tissue enlargement in men and water retention.

SARMs also won’t suppress natural testosterone production anywhere near the level most anabolic steroids do, meaning your hormonal system is taking less of a hit each cycle.

Many people will say that SARMs are safer to use than steroids, mainly for the reasons above. There is an element of truth to this, but overall because SARMs are still experimental drugs and many don’t even have human clinical trials to speak of, the long-term effects are still unknown and they could well be potentially dangerous steroids; after all, the use of any type of high-dose performance-enhancing drug will always carry a risk of both short- and long-term health implications.

Prohormones are precursors to anabolic steroids. Testosterone and nandrolone prohormones are commonly used by some athletes and are detectable in drug tests. Just like SARMs and steroids, prohormones are also banned by world doping organizations. After a prohormone is administered, it can be converted by the body into an anabolic steroid.

The main types of prohormones or anabolic steroid precursors used include Androstenedione,

Androstenediol, Norandrostenedione, Norandrostenediol, and Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA).
The only prohormone available in the US without a prescription is DHEA, but it too is banned by many professional sports bodies as a performance-enhancing substance, even though DHEA is a natural hormone in the body (as is the testosterone, which is the basis for most anabolic steroids).

DHEA can indirectly increase levels of steroid hormones like testosterone, so when taken in high doses it can certainly have a performance-enhancing effect; hence why it is also prohibited.

Prohormones have the same effects on the body as anabolic steroids when it comes to both benefits and side effects because they are converted into steroids in the body. This makes these two types of compounds essentially the same, while SARMs are in a category of their own.

They are all powerful substances in their own right, and the decision to use any of these categories of compounds needs to be well thought through not only in terms of benefits, but also side effects, and that is where SARMs are becoming more of a first choice problem for many people who want to avoid the more serious side effects of anabolic steroids.


Anyone starting out with SARMs would be wise to start with just one compound at first, just like when starting out with anabolic steroids.

Taking on more than one SARM does not allow you to assess the precise effect each has, and possibly more importantly the fact that you would not be able to identify which SARM is causing which side effects, if any. So even though SARMs can be stacked, this is not recommended for beginners.

So let’s say you’ve already had some experience with SARMs and are thinking of taking it to the next level; this is where you start to think about stacking and if combining multiple SARMs would actually provide additional benefits and if so, which SARMs are best to use in a stack?

As with steroids, the formation of a SARM stack depends primarily on your goals: are you trying to reduce fat or increase lean muscle mass? Identify your goals before building a SARM stack so you can make a decision with these goals in mind.

Let’s look at the two main stacks that SARM users would aim to build a stack for: cutting and bulking.

SARM cycle for cutting

Because SARMs were originally researched and tested for the purpose of treating diseases that involve muscle wasting, such as after cancer treatment, it goes without saying that they could potentially be great for cutting where you’re going to be calorie deficient while working to burn as much fat as possible while maintaining a lean physique, ideally not losing any of your existing lean muscle.

Some cutting stacks may also aim to build some muscle, while others focus solely on burning fat.

A quality SARM cutting stack can be as simple as two SARMs taken over a 10-week period: Cardarine (10mg daily) and Ostarine (20mg daily). While you won’t need to do PCT after this stack, a break of a minimum of four weeks is recommended for recovery.

Cycle with SARMs for bulking

There are several SARM stacking options when your goal is to build mass and bulk up with lean muscle growth. All of these should result in quick wins, but keep in mind that unlike the basic cutting stack above, these stacks require you to follow up with PCT.

An added benefit of bulking up with SARMs is that you’ll also typically see a huge improvement in energy, greatly increasing your performance and ultimately helping you gain that muscle faster with your boosted workouts.

An example of a quality SARM mass building stack is using Testolone and Ligandrol at 15mg each day for two months, followed by a four week break plus PCT.

Strength is another area you can target with a SARM stack. YK-11 and Ligandrol will provide great benefits in this area, increasing your weightlifting ability for faster gains; so essentially this can also be considered a massive building stack, but only if you put hard yards into your gym work.

You can run this stack as a short 6 week cycle and see good results with Ligandrol at 20mg daily and YK-11 at 10mg daily. As YK-11 is particularly potent, this stack will likely require a PCT, and you should take at least a month off from using the compounds to aid recovery.


Despite popular belief that SARMs are not as harmful as anabolic steroids, or have similar or other side effects, these compounds carry more risks than most people realize.

For starters, we can think of SARMs as essentially research chemicals. Many have been developed and then stopped by pharmaceutical companies for a variety of reasons, in the process of research and development. That means most SARMs are largely untested and remain a mystery when it comes to not only their short-term effects, but also what impacts they can have on long-term health.

Most SARMs haven’t even been through animal studies, so when it comes to their use in humans, we’re essentially looking for unapproved, untested substances that have never been through the rigorous testing and trials that other drugs do have had in the past, including even steroids.

This means that the possible side effects of SARMs, although many are now becoming more apparent as more people try these compounds, are still not fully understood and it could take many years or even decades to get any idea of the long-term effects term caused by SARMs from people who use them a lot today.

Let’s look at the known possible side effects of a SARM cycle:

Increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

This is a risk factor that is often listed by regulatory authorities, despite the fact that there is still little real-world evidence in humans to actually support it.

We know that these are risk factors for heavy steroid users and may also be the case with long-term heavy SARM use; Once again, maintaining reasonable dosages of your chosen SARM compounds is key to reducing all risks of side effects and minimizing long-term health effects.

Eye sight problems

Blind spots and reduced vision in low light have been shown to be a problem with some SARMs, and clinical trials of Andarine S4 in humans result in visual changes being one of the biggest concerns. So while this is not a side effect with all SARMs, it is one to be aware of and another area where the research is not yet adequate for us to know if other SARMs are an eye health risk.


It is believed that some SARMs can potentially worsen cholesterol health by lowering the good type of cholesterol, HDL. This can lead to the potential risk of cardiovascular disease.

The true effects of SARMs on cholesterol are not yet fully understood and long-term data are not available, especially with the off-label use of these compounds among bodybuilders and athletes, and some trials have even found that a SARM in Ostarine resulted in a decrease in cholesterol levels in test subjects. In any case, it is advisable to maintain a cholesterol-friendly diet low in saturated fat and high in healthy omega-3 fatty acids both while using SARMs and when taking a break.


While it is not yet known whether SARMs can directly lead to cancer formation in humans, the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline has discontinued the development of at least one SARM (Cardarine) due to serious toxicities, including the development of multiple types of cancers in mice. , which was established over a long period of studies.

Hepatic injury

SARMs are believed to pose a high risk to the liver due to their toxicity. An FDA advisory in 2017 listed liver damage as one of its top concerns about the use of SARMs in bodybuilding products.

There is still a lot of debate among enthusiasts as to whether SARMs are toxic to the liver, as the composition of their chemical structure theoretically suggests that they are not, but the FDA warning and other evidence suggests that liver damage is in fact a risk of SARM use, even if not as prominent as that which comes with some oral anabolic steroids which can be very toxic to the liver.

So we can see that SARMs are certainly not without risks of side effects, and when used in higher doses than are more likely by high-performance athletes, it is even possible to experience similar or the same side effects as anabolic steroids. .

While much is still unknown about SARMs, it is almost certain that the more SARMs you take, the higher the dosage, and the longer period of time you continue to take them, the inevitability of side effects is virtually impossible to avoid.

Because the very few human studies done so far with SARMs have been completed using medical doses that are much lower than those used by athletes, side effects at higher doses will not be fully understood for some time.


As with anabolic steroids, different results can be expected with the use of different SARMs. We know that some are more useful for cutting and burning fat, while others excel at helping you bulk up and build strength.

Users of some SARMs at performance enhancing doses can expect to see noticeable increases in muscle mass and strength and these will be quality muscle gains because SARMs and other similar compounds described in this guide do not cause water retention which can mask great part of his gains on steroids;

For SARM users, this is one of the biggest benefits and most attractive advantages over anabolic steroids.

Losing fat is another result you can expect with many SARMs, especially those that have been developed to address obesity, where they can promote metabolism and the burning of stored fat, without putting the body into a catabolic state where muscle tissue is lost.

Other SARMs will increase your endurance and your ability to fight muscle fatigue and soreness, and these are the SARMs that are especially valued by endurance athletes.

Using a SARM alone will usually give you some of the results you can expect, having heard about the experience of other people using the compound. But it is the stacking of SARMs and other compounds that can really power your results in the areas of muscle gain and performance, and for advanced users this is often the strategy to follow, just as steroid users will stack multiple compounds to take advantage of its different properties during a cycle.

During a well-planned SARM stacking cycle, expect to see excellent muscle definition develop as your muscles harden and grow, while being able to burn fat more efficiently and see a noticeable increase in your strength, endurance and capacity to perform harder, longer and with less downtime between workouts thanks to better muscle recovery and reduced risk of injury.


We know that all anabolic steroid cycles must be followed with some form of post cycle therapy (PCT) due to the generally severe suppression of normal testosterone function that steroids cause. When it comes to SARMs, we often read about how they don’t cause any side effects, including that they don’t cause testosterone suppression, but this is not entirely true.

While low doses of most SARMs are unlikely to affect testosterone, at the higher doses that athletes and bodybuilders want to use for performance-enhancing results, suppression is a real possibility and, in fact, it is very likely with some SARMs in particular, especially RAD-140, Ligandrol and YK11.

Taking higher doses of Ostarine will also put you in a position where PCT will be beneficial and even necessary, as higher doses of this SARM, say 25mg a day, can actually cause testosterone suppression. They won’t suppress it as much as steroids do, which can stop testosterone production altogether, but the suppression is usually enough that you need PCT after the SARM cycle.

Women using SARMs will be pleased to know that you don’t need to do PCT when using SARMs, just make sure you take at least a four week break between SARM cycles.


Is SARM a steroid?

There are two types of SARMs, the first SARMs developed were steroids, but those developed only in the last two or three decades are known as non-steroidal SARMs.

Although most modern SARMs are not steroids, they still cause anabolic activity in the muscles and bones and that is why they are highly valued by fitness enthusiasts, bodybuilders and even professional athletes who want an alternative to anabolic steroids with lower risk of testosterone Suppression, no estrogenic side effects, and less risk of other side effects that come with steroid use.

Can SARMs come in capsules?

Some SARMs are manufactured in capsule form, although this is not legal because SARMs are not approved for human use by authorities in the US and other countries.

While capsule SARMs provide an easy way to take your dose, there is a risk of poor quality, under dosing, overdosing, or contamination if the SARM capsules have been manufactured in a non-professional setting. This is why most people will buy SARMs in liquid form from research labs, so you know you’re getting the real deal.

SARMs are sometimes included in supplements, but these should be taken with caution, as again, the origin of the SARM can rarely be told in these cases.

Will SARMs cause hair loss?

We know that one of the most feared side effects of anabolic and androgenic steroids is hair loss or male pattern baldness in men who are genetically predisposed to it. One of the most attractive things about SARMs for many men is, if we listen to the marketers who sell them, that SARMs do not pose a risk of hair loss.

But the fact is that SARMs can cause hair loss in some people, just like steroids. This side effect is primarily a concern when taking SARMs in high doses, as are most high-performance athletes. It is not considered a great risk at lower doses.

If you experience hair loss while taking SARMs, the bad news is that it will be permanent; unless you have some kind of effective hair restoration plan.

Can SARMs cause a heart attack?

The long-term effects of SARMs are still unknown when it comes to their use by humans. We know that cancer was an effect when SARMs were given to mice over a relatively long period.

Another very serious concern that many people have about people using SARMs is whether they affect cardiovascular health and potentially lead to heart attacks. In 2017, the US FDA issued a warning about

SARMs, stating that they can increase the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Are SARMs banned by the AMA?

All SARMs are banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency and have been since 2008. It is listed in the category of banned substances under Anabolic Agents, which is the same category that steroids are listed under.

This means that SARMs are never allowed and any drug test that comes back positive for any SARM will be dealt with according to the rules of your particular sport.

Since it became a banned substance, dozens of professional athletes have tested positive for MRSA over the years and have been banned or penalized.

Can SARMs be found in dietary supplements?

Although it is not legal to include SARMs in bodybuilding supplements, this is a widespread practice with some supplement manufacturers blatantly advertising their use of SARMs, and others not even listing a

SARM as an ingredient.

The latter can put athletes undergoing regular doping tests at risk if they have consumed a supplement that unknowingly contained SARMs. This is why only taking supplements that are from reputable companies where the ingredients are 100% safe is a must for anyone exposed to drug testing, as well as if you simply want to avoid SARMs altogether.

How long do SARMs take to activate?

New users of SARMs may make the mistake of believing that results will be noticeable as quickly as when using anabolic steroids, but this is not really the case with SARMs. They just don’t work as fast as steroids.

Steroids are synthetic hormones, primarily testosterone, so they have a powerful effect on the body and do so quickly after administration.

Non-steroidal SARMs, on the other hand, are not giving you the effects of a powerful hormone like anabolic steroids and you will need to use SARMs for a longer time before you start to see results, and this requires patience.

Some SARM compounds can produce noticeable changes in about 4 weeks, while others can take up to 8 weeks to kick in and cause you to notice benefits.

Therefore, SARMs require a longer-term approach to use, but on the upside they don’t have the same drastic negative effect on your hormonal system and overall health as steroids.

How long should you cycle SARMs?

Considering the slower effects of SARMs on the body, the minimum cycle length for most SARMs should be 8 weeks. But most people will opt to go longer, with 12 weeks being the standard for experienced users. A simple cycle for beginners should consist of only one or two SARMs for 8 to 12 weeks.

It’s important not to worry about not seeing immediate results and focus on long-term benefits where consistency will be key to getting those quality muscle gains, whether you’re comfortable doing 8-week cycles, 12-week cycles, or anything in between. : Long-term constant is what will give you the results.

What SARMs should women use?

Women can use most SARMs and most women will want to use the compounds that improve endurance and fat loss, rather than muscle gain. Ligandrol and andarine are commonly used by women to help tone muscle and reduce fat, and this can be achieved in low doses as low as 5mg per day.

What is the best SARM that would pair well with Clen for weight loss and muscle gain?
I do not recommend pairing Clenbuterol with SARMs. If you want a cutting stack that works, go for this one:

Week 1-12 – 30mg/day SR9009 (Stenabolic)
Week 1-12 – 50 mg/day S4 (Andarine) 25 mg in the morning and 25 mg 4-6 hours later
Week 1-12 – 20 mg/day GW-501516 (Cardarine) 30 minutes before training
Week 1-12 – 25mg/day MK-2866 (Ostarine)
Week 13-15 – Mini Clomid PCT with 50mg/day and 20mg/day GW-501516

What cycle or stack do you recommend for women looking to increase endurance, build muscle, and lose fat?

If you are looking for a particular SARM I would say 10-20mg/day of Cardarine for 8 weeks. Another option is an oral steroid compound called Anavar at 10mg/day (split into 2 doses a day at 5mg/each, once with breakfast and again at bedtime) over a period of 8 weeks. With both options, shed as much fat as you can naturally, first do some heavy cardio, then use one of them.


SARMs have become popular with bodybuilders who might want to avoid anabolic steroids due to known side effects, and who believe that SARMs do not carry the same risks while still providing excellent performance benefits.

SARMs are useful for both building muscle and preserving it, as one of their main goals is to prevent catabolism. When used with a proper diet, SARMs reduce the risk of losing your muscle gains earned as a bodybuilder.

Editor’s Note: I am not advising anyone to use steroids.


Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop